Journal Article Review Ppublish 10 citations
PubMed: 35725118 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.020
Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology.
Fertil Steril 118(1):19-28
Authors: Kate Devine, Shelley Dolitsky, Inga Ludwin, Artur Ludwin
Affiliations
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Program in Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Shady Grove Fertility, Washington, D.C.
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Program in Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland; Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology, Private Medical Center, Krakow, Poland.
Abstract
The high efficacy of modern assisted reproductive technology (ART) and increase in the number of noninfertile patients who are using ART for family building in the United States call into question the relevance of the standard, one-size-fits-all infertility evaluation. Here, we explore whether all patients presenting for ART need uterine cavity and tubal assessment and what tests are most appropriate, efficient, and cost-effective in current times.
MeSH
Infertility, Fertility, Fallopian Tubes, Technology, Hysteroscopy
Cited by
- Spontaneous Pregnancy after 4D-Hysterosalpingo-Sonography (HyCoSy) in the Same Menstrual Cycle: A Case Report and an Updating Review of the Current Literature regarding the Positive Impact of Tubal Flushing Effect on Fertility. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol, 2024
- A Large Study About Reproductive Factors That Predict Hysterosalpingography-Identified Tubal Pathology: An Insight into the Necessity of Preconception Screening. J Clin Med, 2025