Journal Article Review Epublish 7 citations
PubMed: 37810593 DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2023.1247815
Recalcitrance to transformation, a hindrance for genome editing of legumes.
Front Genome Ed 5:1247815
Authors: V M Nivya, Jasmine M Shah
Affiliations
- Department of Plant Science, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Abstract
Plant genome editing, a recently discovered method for targeted mutagenesis, has emerged as a promising tool for crop improvement and gene function research. Many genome-edited plants, such as rice, wheat, and tomato, have emerged over the last decade. As the preliminary steps in the procedure for genome editing involve genetic transformation, amenability to genome editing depends on the efficiency of genetic engineering. Hence, there are numerous reports on the aforementioned crops because they are transformed with relative ease. Legume crops are rich in protein and, thus, are a favored source of plant proteins for the human diet in most countries. However, legume cultivation often succumbs to various biotic/abiotic threats, thereby leading to high yield loss. Furthermore, certain legumes like peanuts possess allergens, and these need to be eliminated as these deprive many people from gaining the benefits of such crops. Further genetic variations are limited in certain legumes. Genome editing has the potential to offer solutions to not only combat biotic/abiotic stress but also generate desirable knock-outs and genetic variants. However, excluding soybean, alfalfa, and , reports obtained on genome editing of other legume crops are less. This is because, excluding the aforementioned three legume crops, the transformation efficiency of most legumes is found to be very low. Obtaining a higher number of genome-edited events is desirable as it offers the option to genotypically/phenotypically select the best candidate, without the baggage of off-target mutations. Eliminating the barriers to genetic engineering would directly help in increasing genome-editing rates. Thus, this review aims to compare various legumes for their transformation, editing, and regeneration efficiencies and discusses various solutions available for increasing transformation and genome-editing rates in legumes.
MeSH
Solutions, Genetic Engineering, Genes, Pulse, Genome, Gene Editing
Cited by
- Establishing a CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing framework in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) by targeting phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene disruption. J Genet Eng Biotechnol, 2025
- Genome editing for sustainable agriculture in Peru: advances, potential applications and regulation. Front Genome Ed, 2025
- Initial shoot regeneration in the selenium hyperaccumulator Neptunia amplexicaulis and in vitro test system for selenium tolerance and accumulation. Nat Prod Bioprospect, 2025
- The challenge of breeding for reduced off-flavor in faba bean ingredients. Front Plant Sci, 2023
- Lupins in the genome editing era: advances in plant cell culture, double haploid technology and genetic transformation for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci, 2025