Journal Article Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Epublish 7 citations
PubMed: 39407214 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03700-9
Common pitfalls in drug target Mendelian randomization and how to avoid them.
BMC Med 22(1):473
Authors: Dipender Gill, Marie-Joe Dib, Héléne T Cronjé, Ville Karhunen, Benjamin Woolf, Eloi Gagnon, Iyas Daghlas, Michael Nyberg, Donald Drakeman, Stephen Burgess
Affiliations
- Sequoia Genetics, London, UK.
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 90 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK.
- Cardiovascular Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
- Sequoia Genetics, London, UK.
- Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Cardiovascular Biology, Global Drug Discovery, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev, Denmark.
- University of Cambridge Centre for Health Leadership & Enterprise, Judge Business School, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, UK. Advent Venture Partners, London, UK.
- Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Drug target Mendelian randomization describes the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables for studying the effects of pharmacological agents. The paradigm can be used to inform on all aspects of drug development and has become increasingly popular over the last decade, particularly given the time- and cost-efficiency with which it can be performed even before commencing clinical studies.
MAIN BODY
In this review, we describe the recent emergence of drug target Mendelian randomization, its common pitfalls, how best to address them, as well as potential future directions. Throughout, we offer advice based on our experiences on how to approach these types of studies, which we hope will be useful for both practitioners and those translating the findings from such work.
CONCLUSIONS
Drug target Mendelian randomization is nuanced and requires a combination of biological, statistical, genetic, epidemiological, clinical, and pharmaceutical expertise to be utilized to its full potential. Unfortunately, these skillsets are relatively infrequently combined in any given study.
MeSH
Pharmaceutical Preparations, Random Allocation
Cited by
- Mendelian Randomisation: Concepts, Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions. Glob Heart, 2025
- A Hypothesis That Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Exert Immediate and Multifaceted Effects by Activating Adenosine Monophosphate-Activate Protein Kinase (AMPK). Life (Basel), 2025
- Genetic insights support PARP1 as a mediator in the protective association of ATP-citrate lyase inhibitors with melanoma. Commun Biol, 2025
- Human Genetics Informing Drug Development in Cardiovascular Disease: Interleukin-6 Signaling as a Case Study. Circ Genom Precis Med, 2025
- Introduction to Mendelian randomization. Ann Clin Epidemiol, 2025
- Plasma protein levels and hepatocellular carcinoma: a Mendelian randomization study with drug screening implications. Discov Oncol, 2025
- Genome-wide association study for circulating metabolic traits in 619,372 individuals. medRxiv, 2025