Journal Article Epublish 5 citations
PubMed: 39460274 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12101107
Comparative Effectiveness of the Bivalent (Original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines mRNA-1273.222 and BNT162b2 Bivalent in Adults with Underlying Medical Conditions in the United States.
Vaccines (Basel) 12(10)
Authors: Hagit Kopel, Van Hung Nguyen, Alina Bogdanov, Isabelle Winer, Catherine Boileau, Thierry Ducruet, Ni Zeng, Jessamine P Winer-Jones, Daina B Esposito, Mary Bausch-Jurken, Ekkehard Beck, Machaon Bonafede, James A Mansi
Affiliations
- Moderna, Inc. Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
- VHN Consulting Inc. Montreal, QC H2V 3L8, Canada.
- Veradigm, Chicago, IL 60654, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
This retrospective cohort study evaluated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of two bivalent (original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) vaccines mRNA-1273.222 versus the BNT162b2 Bivalent in preventing COVID-19-related outcomes in adults with underlying medical conditions associated with increased risk for severe COVID-19.
METHODS
In a linked electronic health record/claims dataset, US adults (≥18 years) with ≥1 underlying medical condition of interest who received either the bivalent vaccine between 31 August 2022 and 28 February 2023 were identified. The inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for cohort differences. Cohorts were followed up for COVID-19-related hospitalizations and outpatient encounters until 31 May 2023. Hazard ratios and rVEs were estimated using Cox regression. Subgroup analyses were performed on individuals with pre-specified comorbid conditions.
RESULTS
757,572 mRNA-1273.222 and 1,204,975 BNT162b2 Bivalent recipients were identified. The adjusted rVE over a median follow-up of 198 days was 10.9% (6.2%-15.2%) against COVID-19-related hospitalization and 3.2% (1.7%-4.7%) against COVID-19-related outpatient encounters. rVE estimates for COVID-19 hospitalizations among subgroups with comorbid conditions were as follows: diabetes 15.1% (8.7%-21.0%), cerebro- and cardiovascular disease 14.7% (9.0%-20.1%), chronic lung disease 11.9% (5.1%-18.2%), immunocompromised 15.0% (7.2%-22.2%), chronic kidney disease 8.4% (0.5%-15.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, among adults with underlying medical conditions, mRNA-1273.222 was more effective than BNT162b2 Bivalent, especially in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalizations.
MeSH
Comorbidity, Hospitalization, Vaccines, Covid-19 Vaccines, Rna, Messenger, Covid-19, Outpatients
Cited by
- Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Updated 2023/24 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in High-Risk Populations in the United States. Infect Dis Ther, 2025
- Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Adults with Underlying Medical Conditions: Systematic Literature Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis Using GRADE. Adv Ther, 2025
- Cardiopulmonary Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Vaccines (Basel), 2025
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of mRNA-1273.815 Against COVID-19 Hospitalization Among Adults Aged ≥ 18 Years in the United States. Infect Dis Ther, 2024