Publications

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Ppublish

PubMed: 39615678 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.108043

Apoptotic signaling by TNFR1 is inhibited by the α2-6 sialylation, but not α2-3 sialylation, of the TNFR1 N-glycans.

J Biol Chem 301(1):108043

Authors: Jihye Hwang, Tejeshwar C Rao, Jiahui Tao, Bingdong Sha, Yoshiki Narimatsu, Henrik Clausen, Alexa L Mattheyses, Susan L Bellis

Affiliations

  • Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Abstract

The TNF-TNFR1 signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in regulating the balance between cell survival and cell death. Upon binding to TNF, plasma membrane-localized TNFR1 initiates survival signaling, whereas TNFR1 internalization promotes caspase-mediated apoptosis. We previously reported that the α2-6 sialylation of TNFR1 by the tumor-associated sialyltransferase ST6GAL1 diverts signaling toward survival by inhibiting TNFR1 internalization. In the current investigation, we interrogated the mechanisms underlying sialylation-dependent regulation of TNFR1 and uncovered a novel role for α2-6 sialylation, but not α2-3 sialylation, in mediating apoptosis-resistance. Our studies utilized HEK293 cells with deletion of sialyltransferases that modify N-glycans with either α2-3-linked sialic acids (ST3GAL3/4/6) or α2-6-linked sialic acids (ST6GAL1/2). Additionally, ST6GAL1 was re-expressed in cells with ST6GAL1/2 deletion to restore α2-6 sialylation. Using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy and BS 3 cross-linking, we determined that, under basal conditions, cells expressing TNFR1 devoid of α2-6 sialylation displayed enhanced TNFR1 oligomerization, an event that poises cells for activation by TNF. Moreover, upon stimulation with TNF, greater internalization of TNFR1 was observed via time-lapse TIRF and flow cytometry, and this correlated with increased caspase-dependent apoptosis. These effects were reversed by ST6GAL1 re-expression. Conversely, eliminating α2-3 sialylation did not significantly alter TNFR1 clustering, internalization or apoptosis. We also evaluated the Fas receptor, given its structural similarity to TNFR1. As with TNFR1, α2-6 sialylation had a selective effect in protecting cells against Fas-mediated apoptosis. These results collectively suggest that ST6GAL1 may serve a unique function in shielding cancer cells from apoptotic stimuli within the tumor microenvironment.

MeSH

Sialic Acids, Cells, N-Acetylneuraminic Acid, Biochemistry, Polysaccharides, Neoplasms, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, Caspases, Receptors, Death Domain, Apoptosis, Sialyltransferases