System Maintenance Notice

Please note that maintenance work is scheduled between 4 AM and 5 AM - CET. During this time, you may experience reduced performance. Thanks for your patience.

Publications

Journal Article Validation Study Ppublish 1 citation

PubMed: 40316015 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2025.102253

An artificial intelligence interpretable tool to predict risk of deep vein thrombosis after endovenous thermal ablation.

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 13(5):102253

Authors: Azadeh Tabari, Yu Ma, Jesus Alfonso, Anthony Gebran, Haytham Kaafarani, Dimitris Bertsimas, Dania Daye

Affiliations

  • Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  • Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) stands as one of the primary treatments for superficial venous insufficiency. Concern exists about the potential for thromboembolic complications following this procedure. Although rare, those complications can be severe, necessitating early identification of patients prone to increased thrombotic risks. This study aims to leverage artificial intelligence-based algorithms to forecast patients' likelihood of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) within 30 days following EVTA.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2017, all patients who underwent EVTA were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We developed and validated four machine learning models using demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values to predict the risk of postoperative DVT: Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Optimal Classification Trees (OCT), Random Forests, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The models were trained using all the available variables. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis was adopted to interpret model outcomes and offer medical insights into feature importance and interactions.

RESULTS

A total of 21,549 patients were included (mean age, 54 ± 14 years; 67% female). In this cohort, 1.59% developed DVT. The XGBoost model had good discriminative power for predicting DVT risk with area under the curve of 0.711 in the hold-out test set for the all-variable model. Stratification of the test set by age, body mass index, preoperative white blood cell count, and platelet count shows that the model performs equally well across these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated an interpretable model that enables physicians to predict which patients with superficial venous insufficiency has higher risk of developing DVT within 30 days following EVTA.

MeSH

Intelligence, Venous Insufficiency, Thrombosis, Artificial Intelligence, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Veins