Journal Article Ppublish
PubMed: 40487963 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.103804
Predicting gastric cancer survival using machine learning: A systematic review.
World J Gastrointest Oncol 17(5):103804
Authors: Hong-Niu Wang, Jia-Hao An, Fu-Qiang Wang, Wen-Qing Hu, Liang Zong
Affiliations
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzhi People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China. Graduate School of Medicine, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China.
- Department of Graduate School of Medicine, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China.
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzhi People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China.
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzhi People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Gastric cancer (GC) has a poor prognosis, and the accurate prediction of patient survival remains a significant challenge in oncology. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool for survival prediction, though concerns regarding model interpretability, reliance on retrospective data, and variability in performance persist.
AIM
To evaluate ML applications in predicting GC survival and to highlight key limitations in current methods.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science in November 2024 identified 16 relevant studies published after 2019. The most frequently used ML models were deep learning (37.5%), random forests (37.5%), support vector machines (31.25%), and ensemble methods (18.75%). The dataset sizes varied from 134 to 14177 patients, with nine studies incorporating external validation.
RESULTS
The reported area under the curve values were 0.669-0.980 for overall survival, 0.920-0.960 for cancer-specific survival, and 0.710-0.856 for disease-free survival. These results highlight the potential of ML-based models to improve clinical practice by enabling personalized treatment planning and risk stratification.
CONCLUSION
Despite challenges concerning retrospective studies and a lack of interpretability, ML models show promise; prospective trials and multidimensional data integration are recommended for improving their clinical applicability.
MeSH
Neoplasms, Machine Learning, Learning, Stomach Neoplasms