Publications

Journal Article Ahead of print

PubMed: 41534775 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2026.01.003

Antimicrobial resistance in the Bacteroides fragilis group: national multicenter survey and Bayesian modelling study, France, 2022-2023.

J Glob Antimicrob Resist

Authors: Gauthier Delvallez, Pascal Campagne, Corentine Alauzet, Laure Diancourt, Frédéric Barbut, Hélène Marchandin, Bruno Dupuy

Affiliations

  • National Reference Center for Anaerobic bacteria and Botulism, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France; Pathogenesis of Bacterial Anaerobes, Department of Microbiology, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Cité, UMR-CNRS 6047, Paris, France.
  • Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Hub, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
  • Université de Lorraine, SIMPA, F-54000, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, F-54000, Nancy, France.
  • National Reference Center for Anaerobic bacteria and Botulism, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
  • National Reference Laboratory for Clostridioides difficile, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, 75012, France; Université Paris-Cité, Unité INSERM 1139, FPRM, 75006, Paris, France.
  • HydroSciences Montpellier, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène hospitalière, CHU de Nimes, France.
  • Pathogenesis of Bacterial Anaerobes, Department of Microbiology, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Cité, UMR-CNRS 6047, Paris, France.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Epidemiological studies on Bacteroides fragilis group (BFG) species and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles remain scarce worldwide and are lacking in France. The aim of this study was to provide comprehensive national data on the distribution of BFG species, isolation sites, AMR and its potential regional disparity.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted from January 2022 to December 2023 using routine data from 45 French hospitals. A total of 9,458 BFG isolates identified to the species level by MALDI-ToF were included. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed according to French guidelines using either disc diffusion or gradient diffusion methods. AST results were collected for ten antibiotics: amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), piperacillin-tazobactam (PIT), imipenem (IMI), clindamycin (CLI), metronidazole (MET), moxifloxacin, tigecycline, linezolid, rifampicin, and chloramphenicol. A Bayesian statistical model was applied to estimate regional resistance frequencies with corresponding credible intervals.

RESULTS

Bacteroides fragilis sensu stricto (B. fragilis) was the most prevalent species (62.4%), followed by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (14.2%). Resistance to IMI and MET remained low, while AMC, PIT, and CLI resistance varied markedly across species: 5.2%, 3.6%, and 34.4% for B. fragilis; 18.0%, 50.1%, and 72.9% for B. thetaiotaomicron; and 32.1%, 19.5%, and 75.2% for Parabacteroides distasonis, respectively. Bayesian modelling produced robust regional estimates for B. fragilis, revealing noticeable regional disparities, particularly for AMC, PIT, and MET.

CONCLUSION

Bayesian modeling revealed substantial interspecies and interregional differences in BFG resistance, highlighting the importance of species-level identification and localized surveillance to inform empirical antibiotic therapy.

MeSH

Epidemiology, Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination, Bacteroides Fragilis, Bacteroides, Drug Resistance