System Maintenance Notice

Please note that maintenance work is scheduled between 4 AM and 5 AM - CET. During this time, you may experience reduced performance. Thanks for your patience.

Publications

Journal Article Ahead of print

PubMed: 42219037 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2026.103228

Unmasking manels: a gender disparity exposé in major gynecologic surgery congresses in France and Europe.

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod

Authors: Estelle Tromelin, Marion Pinsard, Léa Roux, Vincent Lavoué, Jean Levêque, Ludivine Dion, Rémi Beranger, Maela Le Lous, Krystel Nyangoh Timoh

Affiliations

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, University of Rennes, Rennes, France; INSERM, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) - UMR_S 1085, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rennes University Hospital, University of Rennes, Rennes, France; INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, University of Rennes, Rennes, France; Laboratory of Anatomy and Organogenesis, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The persistent underrepresentation of women in academic forums is concerning. Their equitable representation in gynecology conferences is not only emblematic of progress but pivotal for advancement of the field. We studied the prevalence of "manels" (all-male panels) within gynecologic surgery congresses spanning France and Europe.

METHODS

We examined the scientific programs from five leading gynecologic surgery conferences held in France and Europe during 2020-2021. Comprehensive data, including faculty details, was collected. Primary outcomes were: (1) mean male faculty percentage across all sessions, and (2) overarching manel presence. Results were stratified by specific congresses and subspecialties, with further comparative analyses between manels vs. multigender sessions and male vs. female faculty attributes.

RESULTS

Of 144 sessions, 45 (31.3%) were identified as manels. Male faculty averaged 78.7% across all sessions. Consistent male predominance was observed across all congresses and subspecialties. Interestingly, sessions with a gender mix were not only lengthier but also featured a greater number of chairs/moderators and speakers compared to manels (p<0.001). Among the 882 faculty members, male faculty exhibited more practice years, a higher publication count, superior H-index (p<0.001), and predominant professor presence compared to their female counterparts. Conversely, female faculty demonstrated a propensity towards non-gynecology specializations (p<0.001). After adjusting for years of experience, female faculty remained less likely to hold university positions and had lower publication counts and H-index than male faculty (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our investigation highlights manel presence in gynecologic surgery congresses across France and Europe. Women underrepresentation in academic congregations underscores the need for gynecological societies to promote gender equality. As the medical domain becomes more gender-diverse, it is paramount for professional platforms to promote this shift towards inclusivity.

MeSH

Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Gynecology