System Maintenance Notice

Please note that maintenance work is scheduled between 4 AM and 5 AM - CET. During this time, you may experience reduced performance. Thanks for your patience.

Publications

Journal Article Ppublish 1 citation

PubMed: 42269054 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2026.2647611

Validity and reliability of the K5 wearable metabolic system during high-intensity treadmill testing in healthy, young adults.

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 39(4):639-648

Authors: Katelyn D Brown, Belinda Sanchez, Monica Bennett, Jakob Vingren, Taylor Gilliland, Megan Reynolds, Alan Jones, Simon Driver

Affiliations

  • Baylor Scott & White Sports Therapy & Research Center, Frisco, Texas, USA.
  • Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Department of Kinesiology, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA.
  • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COSMED K5 portable metabolic system (K5) enables field-based assessments of gas exchange variables. This study evaluated the validity and test-retest reliability of K5 relative to the laboratory-based ParvoMedics TrueOne2400 ® system (PM) during treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in healthy young adults.

METHODS

Thirty-one adults (mean age 25.8 ± 2.8 years, 61.3% male) completed three Bruce protocol CPET trials: one using PM and two using K5. The order of the first two trials was randomized and counter balanced; the third used K5. Breath-by-breath data were averaged over the final 90 seconds of each CPET stage. Validity was assessed using paired comparisons and Bland-Altman analyses. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

The K5 demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability for oxygen consumption (VO 2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO 2) (ICC = 0.90-0.98). Relative to PM, K5 values for VO 2 and VCO 2 were slightly higher at lower intensities and lower near peak intensities (P < 0.01). Bland-Altman analyses revealed proportional bias for VO 2 and VCO 2 across workloads.

CONCLUSIONS

The K5 is a valid and reliable device for treadmill CPET in healthy young adults. Small systematic differences exist relative to PM at extreme workloads yet remain within acceptable clinical limits, supporting its utility for longitudinal and applied assessments requiring portability.

MeSH

Research Design, Pulmonary Gas Exchange, Workload, Reproducibility Of Results