System Maintenance Notice

Please note that maintenance work is scheduled between 4 AM and 5 AM - CET. During this time, you may experience reduced performance. Thanks for your patience.

Publications

Journal Article Ahead of print

PubMed: 42709034 DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.26.13642-8

Chimney performance in complex abdominal aortic aneurysms compared to fenestrated endovascular aortic repair.

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)

Authors: Miltos Matsagkas, Petroula Nana, Konstantinos Dakis, Konstantinos Spanos, George Kouvelos, Aikaterini Bouzia, Eleni Arnaoutoglou, Athanasios Giannoukas

Affiliations

  • Department of Vascular Surgery, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
  • German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany -.
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The chimney technique may offer an alternative approach for managing juxta- and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). This analysis presents the outcomes of the chimney technique and compares elective chimney and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) findings in complex AAA.

METHODS

The STROBE statement was followed to conduct a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent chimney for complex AAA from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2024. A comparison between elective chimney and FEVAR cases was also performed. Primary outcomes included technical success, mortality and survival.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients underwent chimney (94.4% males); 60 elective cases. Regarding the total chimney cohort, technical success was 98.6% and 30-day mortality 11.1%. Gutter endoleaks were detected in 6.9%; all resolved at 30 days. The mean follow-up was 36.8±5.8 months. Survival was 48.2% (standard error [SE] 9.5%) and freedom from reintervention was 87.3% (SE 6.5%) at 60 months. Forty-one elective FEVARs were compared to 60 elective chimney cases. Elective chimney patients had significantly larger aortic diameters (63 [Q1:56, Q3:78] mm vs. 56 [Q1:54, Q3:66] mm, P=0.02). Technical success (P=0.79) and 30-day mortality (P=0.30) were similar. The mean follow-up in elective chimney was longer compared to FEVAR (40.0±6.3 vs. 27.5±6.3 months; P=0.03). The estimated survival was consistently significantly lower in elective chimney cases (log rank; P=0.003) while freedom from reintervention was similar (P=0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

The chimney technique demonstrated acceptable 30-day outcomes. Compared to elective chimney, 30-day FEVAR outcomes were similar, but FEVAR survival was significantly higher. The need for reintervention was equal.

MeSH

Aortic Aneurysm, Mortality, Aneurysm, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Endovascular Aneurysm Repair