Congress Ahead of print 2 citations
OpenAlex: W2607888692 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1095
Mo1237 Percutaneous Biliary Drainage Versus EUS Guided Biliary Drainage: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study
Gastrointest Endosc 85(5):AB469-AB469
Authors: Erwan Bories, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Fabrice Caillol, Christian Pesenti, Christophe Zemmour, Jean-Marie Boher, Dominique genre, Marc Barthet, Bertrand Napoleon, Marc Giovannini
Affiliations
- Endoscopy, PAOLI CALMETTES INSTITUTE, Marseille, France
- Biostatistics, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
- Endoscopy, CHU Nord, Marseille, France
- Endoscopy, hopital Mermoz, Lyon, France
Abstract
Inclusion criteria were: Benign or malignant obstructive jaundice with failure of ERCP. Exclusion criteria were: ascites, Blood coagulation disorders, stenosis of the right bile duct. Randomization ratio was 1: 1, with a stratification by indication (benign vs malignant) and by centers (4 centers were included). The route of the biliary drainage was randomized as PTB (arm A) and EGD (arm B). But the choice of the EGD technique was free for the operator as (Anterograde transpapillary stenting, choledoco-duodenostomy, hepatico-gastrostomy).
MeSH
Drainage