Abstract

This study analyzes simulated regional-scale ozone burdens both near the surface and aloft, estimates process contributions to these burdens, and calculates the sensitivity of the simulated regional-scale ozone burden to several key model inputs with a particular emphasis on boundary conditions derived from hemispheric or global-scale models. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model simulations supporting this analysis were performed over the continental US for the year 2010 within the context of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) and Task Force on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution (TF-HTAP) activities. CMAQ process analysis (PA) results highlight the dominant role of horizontal and vertical advection on the ozone burden in the mid-to-upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. Vertical mixing, including mixing by convective clouds, couples fluctuations in free-tropospheric ozone to ozone in lower layers. Hypothetical bounding scenarios were performed to quantify the effects of emissions, boundary conditions, and ozone dry deposition on the simulated ozone burden. Analysis of these simulations confirms that the characterization of ozone outside the regional-scale modeling domain can have a profound impact on simulated regional-scale ozone. This was further investigated by using data from four hemispheric or global modeling systems (Chemistry - Integrated Forecasting Model (C-IFS), CMAQ extended for hemispheric applications (H-CMAQ), the Goddard Earth Observing System model coupled to chemistry (GEOS-Chem), and AM3) to derive alternate boundary conditions for the regional-scale CMAQ simulations. The regional-scale CMAQ simulations using these four different boundary conditions showed that the largest ozone abundance in the upper layers was simulated when using boundary conditions from GEOS-Chem, followed by the simulations using C-IFS, AM3, and H-CMAQ boundary conditions, consistent with the analysis of the ozone fields from the global models along the CMAQ boundaries. Using boundary conditions from AM3 yielded higher springtime ozone columns burdens in the middle and lower troposphere compared to boundary conditions from the other models. For surface ozone, the differences between the AM3-driven CMAQ simulations and the CMAQ simulations driven by other large-scale models are especially pronounced during spring and winter where they can reach more than 10 ppb for seasonal mean ozone mixing ratios and as much as 15 ppb for domain-averaged daily maximum 8 h average ozone on individual days. In contrast, the differences between the C-IFS-, GEOS-Chem-, and H-CMAQ-driven regional-scale CMAQ simulations are typically smaller. Comparing simulated sur face ozone mixing ratios to observations and computing seasonal and regional model performance statistics revealed that boundary conditions can have a substantial impact on model performance. Further analysis showed that boundary conditions can affect model performance across the entire range of the observed distribution, although the impacts tend to be lower during summer and for the very highest observed percentiles. The results are discussed in the context of future model development and analysis opportunities.

MeSH

Air Pollution

Cited by

• Dry Deposition of Ozone over Land: Processes, Measurement, and Modeling. Rev Geophys, 2021
• The New Generation of Air Quality Modeling Systems. EM (Pittsburgh Pa), 2018
• Assessing the manageable portion of ground-level ozone in the contiguous United States. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 2021
• A new approach for health-oriented ozone control strategy: Adjoint-based optimization of NO x emission reductions using metaheuristic algorithms. J Clean Prod, 2021
• Establishing the Suitability of the Model for Prediction Across Scales for Global Retrospective Air Quality Modeling. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2021
• Study on the variation of air pollutant concentration and its formation mechanism during the COVID-19 period in Wuhan. Atmos Environ (1994), 2021
• A New Method for Assessing the Efficacy of Emission Control Strategies. Atmos Environ (1994), 2019
• Attributing differences in the fate of lateral boundary ozone in AQMEII3 models to physical process representations. Atmos Chem Phys, 2018
• An Analysis of CMAQ Gas Phase Dry Deposition over North America Through Grid-Scale and Land-Use Specific Diagnostics in the Context of AQMEII4. Atmos Chem Phys, 2023
• An Ensemble Learning Approach for Estimating High Spatiotemporal Resolution of Ground-Level Ozone in the Contiguous United States. Environ Sci Technol, 2020
• The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation. Geosci Model Dev, 2021
• Scientific assessment of background ozone over the U.S.: Implications for air quality management. Elementa (Wash D C), 2018
• Multiscale Modeling of Background Ozone: Research Needs to Inform and Improve Air Quality Management. EM (Pittsburgh Pa), 2020
• How have Divergent Global Emission Trends Influenced Long-range Transported Ozone to North America? J Geophys Res Atmos, 2022
• Incorporation of volcanic SO 2 emissions in the Hemispheric CMAQ (H-CMAQ) version 5.2 modeling system and assessing their impacts on sulfate aerosol over the Northern Hemisphere. Geosci Model Dev, 2022
• Effect of Future Climate Change on Stratosphere-to-Troposphere-Exchange Driven Ozone in the Northern Hemisphere. Aerosol Air Qual Res, 2024
• Source-specific bias correction of US background and anthropogenic ozone modeled in CMAQ. Geosci Model Dev, 2025
• Modeling stratospheric intrusion and trans-Pacific transport on tropospheric ozone using hemispheric CMAQ during April 2010 - Part 2: Examination of emission impacts based on the higher-order decoupled direct method. Atmos Chem Phys, 2020
• Estimating US Background Ozone Using Data Fusion. Environ Sci Technol, 2021
• Seasonal ozone vertical profiles over North America using the AQMEII3 group of air quality models: model inter-comparison and stratospheric intrusions. Atmos Chem Phys, 2019