Abstract

Modeling splicing is essential for tackling the challenge of variant interpretation as each nucleotide variation can be pathogenic by affecting pre-mRNA splicing via disruption/creation of splicing motifs such as 5'/3' splice sites, branch sites, or splicing regulatory elements. Unfortunately, most in silico tools focus on a specific type of splicing motif, which is why we developed the Splicing Prediction Pipeline (SPiP) to perform, in one single bioinformatic analysis based on a machine learning approach, a comprehensive assessment of the variant effect on different splicing motifs. We gathered a curated set of 4616 variants scattered all along the sequence of 227 genes, with their corresponding splicing studies. The Bayesian analysis provided us with the number of control variants, that is, variants without impact on splicing, to mimic the deluge of variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Results show that SPiP can deal with the diversity of splicing alterations, with 83.13% sensitivity and 99% specificity to detect spliceogenic variants. Overall performance as measured by area under the receiving operator curve was 0.986, better than SpliceAI and SQUIRLS (0.965 and 0.766) for the same data set. SPiP lends itself to a unique suite for comprehensive prediction of spliceogenicity in the genomic medicine era. SPiP is available at: https://sourceforge.net/projects/splicing-prediction-pipeline/.

MeSH

Rna, Messenger, Machine Learning

Cited by

• The "extreme phenotype approach" applied to male breast cancer allows the identification of rare variants of ATR as potential breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Oncotarget, 2023
• Functional Characterization of Two Novel Intron 4 Gene Splice Site Pathogenic Variants in Families with Hereditary Angioedema. Biomedicines, 2024
• Identification of new families and variants in autosomal dominant macular dystrophy associated with THRB. Sci Rep, 2025
• A deep intronic variant associated with X-linked hypophosphatemia in a Finnish family. JBMR Plus, 2025
• Evaluation in Monogenic Diabetes of the Impact of , , and Variants on Splicing through the Combined Use of In Silico Tools and Minigene Assays. Hum Mutat, 2023
• Early-Onset Aortic Dissection: Characterization of a New Pathogenic Splicing Variation in the Gene with Several In-Frame Abnormal Transcripts. Hum Mutat, 2023
• Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays. Genome Biol, 2023
• Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: Trends from 25 years of genetic variant impact predictors. bioRxiv, 2024
• Variants in CAPN3 Causing Autosomal Dominant Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Combined With Calpain-3 Deficiency. Hum Mutat, 2025
• A Case of Salt-Wasting Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Caused by a Rare Intronic Variant in the CYP21A2 Gene. Int J Mol Sci, 2025
• Combining full-length gene assay and SpliceAI to interpret the splicing impact of all possible SPINK1 coding variants. Hum Genomics, 2024
• APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP. medRxiv, 2023
• Using the ACMG/AMP framework to capture evidence related to predicted and observed impact on splicing: Recommendations from the ClinGen SVI Splicing Subgroup. Am J Hum Genet, 2023
• New genetic diagnoses for inherited retinal dystrophies by integrating splicing tools into NGS pipelines. NPJ Genom Med, 2025
• RNA Panel Sequencing Is an Effective Tool to Help Classify Splice Variants for Clinical Oncogenetic Diagnosis. Hum Mutat, 2025
• Computational prediction of human deep intronic variation. Gigascience, 2023
• Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays. bioRxiv, 2023
• PDIVAS: Pathogenicity predictor for Deep-Intronic Variants causing Aberrant Splicing. BMC Genomics, 2023
• The phenotypic spectrum of deficiency. JIMD Rep, 2024
• Predicting the impact of rare variants on RNA splicing in CAGI6. Hum Genet, 2025